|
marnesdad 7 months, 1 week ago |
If the foundation of your unbreakable argument is false (overtstaing the NLRB's case against Boeing, the EPA wanting 230,000 new hires, GM/UAW/Chrylsler/US Government trying to drive Ford out of business), then there are only two ways to describe the basis of your arguments -- you are either lying, meaning you KNOW that what you are saying is false, or you don't care to know the accuracy of what you're regurgitating... To claim that you are a victim when people accuse you of lying can only be made if you intend on copping to ignorance... |
|---|---|
|
Heidi 7 months, 1 week ago |
1.866.95.PATRIOT call...challenge him...double dog dare |
|
boneman 7 months, 1 week ago |
Not a chance in hell Heidi |
|
marnesdad 7 months, 1 week ago |
"1.866.95.PATRIOT call...challenge him...double dog dare" Challenge him? To what? ...start telling the truth? ...Read something before commenting on it? What? |
|
boneman 7 months, 1 week ago |
Like I said, no chance in hell.... |
|
Heidi 6 months, 1 week ago |
bwaaaak |
Please login to post a reply.